|
|
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (1 of 7), Read 88 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, December 01, 1999 06:13 PM |
Eric Renneisen, of Chattanooga, Tenn., writes: "Why is there no word for the 'not' or 'no' symbol? You know, the red circle with a slash through the middle."
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (2 of 7), Read 85 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Thursday, December 02, 1999 08:52 AM |
I don't know the history of that particular symbol, but am quite used to using the logical symbol '!' which we refer to as NOT. Alternatively, we can write 'NOT.' I suppose a symbol by any other name would work the same way. We can refer to it as "negation" depending on how we refer to it.
The circle with the line through it is not 'not,' so far as I know; but specifically means 'no.' For example if it is superimposed over the picture of a clown, it means no clowns.
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (3 of 7), Read 78 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Thursday, December 02, 1999 06:17 PM |
>"Why is there no word for the
>'not' or 'no' symbol? You
>know, the red circle with a
>slash through the middle."
actually, I think the signage people may refer to it as the "international no".
as to whether it can mean "not", I'd say "sort of". In some cases it might be interpreted as "Do Not"; e.g., Do Not Enter! (instead of no entry) or Do Not Touch!! (as opposed to no touching).
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (4 of 7), Read 76 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Thursday, December 02, 1999 10:42 PM |
How about: "no-ring".
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (5 of 7), Read 76 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Friday, December 03, 1999 04:35 AM |
On 12/2/99 10:42:40 PM, Trevor Jackson wrote:
>How about: "no-ring".
>
If it's a particularly cold day, is there a risk of no-ring failure?
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (6 of 7), Read 73 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Saturday, December 04, 1999 05:28 PM |
On 12/3/99 4:35:49 AM, Roger Gay wrote:
>On 12/2/99 10:42:40 PM, Trevor Jackson
>wrote:
>>How about: "no-ring".
>>
>
>If it's a particularly cold day, is
>there a risk of no-ring failure?
>
Do you mean there is "snow-ring"?
|
TOP
|
Post
|
Reply
|
Reply/Quote
|
Email Reply
Previous | Next | Previous Topic | Next Topic |
| Topic: | 1) When you're not, you're not (7 of 7), Read 53 times |
| Conf: | Word Fugitives, with Barbara Wallraff |
| From: |
|
| Date: | Wednesday, December 08, 1999 08:56 AM |
certainly not a nose-ring!
Catherine